![]() ![]() There's other solutions for this ( Cocktail, for example), but I use Titanium's Onyx, an essential utility designed to keep your Mac in fantastic shape. Little Snitch runs inconspicuously in the background and can also detect network-related activity that indicates viruses, trojans and other malware. You can then choose to allow benign requests, while forbidding unwanted communication attempts. ![]() This utility monitors your system and lets you know when applications are attempting to make an outgoing connection. How can you tell which applications are doing this, and how can you control what information they send? Simple - install LittleSnitch. To get rid of an application and all its trace files you need AppCleaner, an icon-based solution which finds and deletes all an applications associated files when you delete the software, reclaiming valuable space.Īny active application can send out information to external places from your Mac when they are online. What confuses me about this whole project is that machine learning has been around for some time, and is becoming more and move avaliable to developers on more and more platforms, and despite that we don’t see better tools for automatically detecting this type of content.Unfortunately, applications don't delete their support files when you choose to delete the application, bloating your drive with useless clutter. There is no point in having a human review the photos unless there’s a hit against the database of suppressed perceptual hashes, once an image has been submitted which appears in the database it can be held for review withouth being published (similar to the existing tag review features, which prevent auto-tagging of your face in image). Requiring that each photo be reviewed before submitting isn’t just a privacy problem, it’s too much work. The system we’re talking about is explicitly designed to censor images and flag users who post censorable images, the use of the system to suppress content which some simply doesn’t like can’t be overlooked. Doesn’t have to be compromising, could just be a bad hair day or maybe me parking my car in two handicapped spots. Now, let’s say I have a photo someone sent that I don’t want published to any social network site. Generating the hash on the device better preserves user privacy, using open source software will keep the blood-thirsty IP lawyers at bay. Sending the image to a cloud service exposes the image to potentially multiple parties. Sending the code to generate the perceptual hash to the user exposes it to potential analysis and reverse engineering. Network bandwidth is limited relative to processor power, generating hashes locally is better resource management. Generating perceptual hashes on the device takes processor resources and code, but nothing that my watch couldn’t handle. Sending the image over the network takes bandwidth and exposes the image to more potential viewers (which is what the system is supposed to be preventing in the first place). There are a few things that I like better about this method but looking at the specific tradeoffs helps to understand the advantages: Tradeoff One: Processor Power vs. The image is flagged for review based on content policy.Someone posts an image which matches one of the hashes.Existing posts matching the hash are hidden and reviewed.Hashs are submitted to a database of suppressed image hashes.Perceptual Hashes are Generated on Device.User designates photos & videos they wish to suppress.We can implement a sysetem with the following steps. Given that we have a way to generate a perceptual hash of the photo on the users device, there is no need to send the actuall image to anyone. Thankfully, there are some related, portable, open source efforts which overlap the feature set of PhotoDNA considerably. While there’s a lot of press-release content about the underlying technology being donated to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children there’s no indication that the source code is generally available. The article discusses the existing solution to the problem of unseeable content on the Internet: PhotoDNA. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |